LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Kaolin-Based Hemostat Gets Expanded CE Mark
Company News

Kaolin-Based Hemostat Gets Expanded CE Mark

March 2, 2016 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Kaolin-Based Hemostat Gets Expanded CE Mark
Quik-Clot / Courtesy of Z-Medica, LLC
Secondary

Z-Medica, LLC, a developer and marketer of hemostatic devices, has received an expanded CE Mark for its QuikClot products in the European Union (EU). The expanded indication includes the use of the company’s kaolin-based hemostatic products for traumatic bleeding used in conjunction with anti-coagulant therapy. The indications for use in the EU are now the same as they are for the U.S.

Z-Medica products are designed for external use to control traumatic bleeding. They are indicated as a topical dressing for the managements of bleeding wounds, as a temporary treatment of surgical wounds and traumatic injuries and as an adjunct to manual compression and control of surface bleeding from vascular access sites.

“QuikClot has had a presence in the European markets for quite some time, ” said Z-Medica’s President and CEO Stephen J. Fanning. “The expanded indication means that millions more throughout Europe now have the full benefit of our life-saving technology.”

Z-Medica, LLC was founded in 2002. The Naval Medical Research Center and the U.S. Army Institute for Surgical Research’s Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care chose QuikClot Combat Gauze as the hemostatic dressing of choice on the battlefield for compressible hemorrhage not amenable to tourniquet use or as an adjunct to tourniquet removal if evacuation time is anticipated to be longer than two hours.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy