LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Biologics/Genetic Changes Increase Girls’ Bone Density?
Biologics

Genetic Changes Increase Girls’ Bone Density?

March 29, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Genetic Changes Increase Girls’ Bone Density?
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Hans Kadereit
Secondary

Researchers from The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) have found that rare genetic changes strongly increase the likelihood that girls will have higher bone density.

“We investigated whether the same gene variants that strongly affect bone density in adults also affected bone density in children, ” said co-first author Jonathan A. Mitchell, Ph.D., a pediatric growth researcher and Instructor of Pediatrics at CHOP, in the March 23, 2016 news release. “We found the effect was even stronger in children, but only in girls. The effect may exert lifetime impacts on bone health.” Alessandra Chesi, Ph.D., a genetics researcher at CHOP, was the other co-first author.

As indicated in the news release, “The study team, co-led by senior authors Babette S. Zemel, Ph.D., and Struan F.A. Grant, Ph.D., analyzed a cohort of 1, 418 children and adolescents—733 girls and 685 males, all of European ancestry, who were part of a larger study group, the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study. The researchers focused on rare variants near the gene EN1, because researchers led by a group at McGill University had discovered that this site showed strong effects on increasing bone density in a landmark 2015 whole-genome sequencing study in adults. The researchers found that rare variants near the EN1 gene were indeed the strongest variants to date found in children, but only in females. The study team noted that follow-up research needs to be done to replicate these findings.”

“In addition, functional studies should investigate how the same genetic variants have different effects in males and females, ” said Dr. Grant. “For instance, ” he added, “sex-specific differences in circulating sex hormones and other signaling molecules may play a role in altering bone.”

Dr. Mitchell told OTW, “A team of investigators recently discovered rare genetic variants near EN1 that associated with higher bone mineral density (BMD) in adults and the effect sizes were strikingly large. We were interested in testing if the same rare variants associated with pediatric BMD. Childhood is a key developmental period when bone is being accrued. Greater gains in BMD before peak bone mass is achieved may lower the risk of bone fragility in later life. It is therefore important to know if the skeleton is under the same genetic regulation at all developmental stages.”

“We found that the lead rare variant near EN1 associated with pediatric BMD. Importantly, the direction of association matched that observed in adults and the effect size in the pediatric setting was also strikingly large. Furthermore, we found a sex difference with the association only seen in females and this was particularly interesting given the higher prevalence of osteoporosis and fracture observed among adult women.”

“Rare variants near EN1 are associated with higher BMD across the lifespan. Further research is needed to fully understand the biological implication of these findings but our pediatric results point to an early life genetic mechanism for the risk of osteoporosis and fracture in later life.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy