LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Remote Health Monitoring Devices Use Doubled
Company News

Remote Health Monitoring Devices Use Doubled

January 11, 2016 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Remote Health Monitoring Devices Use Doubled
Wikimedia Commons and Tony Webster
Secondary

The number of patients using remote health monitoring devices doubled in 2015 to 4.9 million due to “rising market acceptance” according to Katie Dvorak, writing for Fierce Health IT. This number does not include individuals who use these tools for tracking their own personal health but does include patients who are part of a health care program that uses medical devices.

Berg Insights, which issued the report, predicts that the number of patients who will be remotely monitored will grow annually by 48.9% and reach more than 36 million by the end of the next five years.

According to a report from Spyglass Consulting Group, more than half of hospitals and health systems are already using remote patient monitoring (RPM) devices. That number is expected to grow to include 15.2 million people by 2020. The reasons for the growth are operational efficiencies, risk management and to control costs.

Dvorak noted that for RPM use to grow as predicted, the industry needs to be more accepting of change, incentive structures must be realigned and wireless broadband must be financially supported.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy