LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/New Official Statement on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Spine

New Official Statement on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

January 18, 2016 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

New Official Statement on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
Scoliosis Patient / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Weiss HR
Secondary

Screening, diagnosis, treatment…earlier is better when it comes to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. According to the January 13, 2016 news release, “A 2013 multicenter National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded study, Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST), documented significant success in preventing spinal curve progression and surgery in children who were screened, diagnosed, and treated with a custom brace.” Now, there are official recommendations.

“Screening for the Early Detection of Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adolescent, ” is a joint statement between the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) and the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS).

“The BrAIST study provided high quality evidence that bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis can decrease the rate of progression of spinal curve to the surgical level, ” said M. Timothy Hresko, M.D., co-author of the revised statement, in the January 13, 2016 news release. “Early detection of scoliosis is essential to identifying patients who may benefit from the use of a spinal brace. The new, 2016 joint position statement—released jointly by four prominent child health organizations—reflects the importance of early scoliosis detection.”

“According to the news release, the new recommendations include: Screening examinations for spine deformity be part of medical home preventive care visits for girls at age 10 and age 12; for boys, once at age 13 or 14. Screening programs have well-trained personnel who can appropriately administer forward bending tests, and the use of a scoliometer, to correctly measure and identify abnormal spine curvature, and to refer patients for additional tests and imaging as needed. Any imaging tests adhere to the principles of ALARA (As Low as Reasonably Achievable) standards to minimize radiation exposure in young patients. Bracing is an effective non-operative intervention to reduce the risk of progression to surgical treatment.”

Dr. Hresko told OTW, “Orthopedic surgeons have noticed that early diagnosis of scoliosis has not been emphasized by primary care physicians, something that has led to misinformation about scoliosis. It was important to reemphasize that brace treatment has been proven to decrease the likelihood of progression to the level where surgery was required. A delay in diagnosis is harmful in that early treatment would not be available to the patient. It is important that we have early recognition by primary care physicians, coaches, physical therapists, and nurses who are seeing children on a regular basis. In addition, the present guidelines of the U.S. preventive services task force has not supported general population screening for scoliosis; however, those guidelines were not meant to be used in the primary care world. It was important to really emphasize the importance of early diagnosis of scoliosis.”

“The most important thing to know about this is that there is agreement amongst orthopedic surgeons, pediatric orthopedic spinal surgeons, and pediatricians that early diagnosis is an important aspect of care of adolescents who may have scoliosis. We all want our adolescents to have the best care possible and scoliosis prevention is a proactive means of improving healthcare.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy