LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Shaky Connection between Radiographic Evidence and Pain
Large Joints and Extremities

Shaky Connection between Radiographic Evidence and Pain

December 18, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Shaky Connection between Radiographic Evidence and Pain
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Planningviz
Secondary

Pain in the hip means a patient has osteoarthritis. Right? Researchers from Boston University School of Medicine say “Not so fast.” According to Caitlyn Fitzpatrick, writing for MD Magazine, in the Farmington Study of 946 patients ages 49 to 79 only 15.6% of patients with frequent hip pain had radiographic signs of osteoarthritis. And only 20.7% of patients with radiographic signs of osteoarthritis had frequent hip pain.

“Given these findings, patients with suspected hip osteoarthritis should be treated regardless of X-ray confirmation, ” said Chan Kim, M.D., corresponding author of the study. He added, “The majority of older subjects with high suspicion for clinical hip osteoarthritis did not have radiographic hip osteoarthritis, suggesting that many older persons with hip osteoarthritis might be missed if diagnosticians relied on hip radiographs to determine if hip pain was due to osteoarthritis.”

The study revealed that hip pain and osteoarthritis do not match up in many cases. Kim noted that failing to catch an osteoarthritis case has harmful consequences. The condition has already been linked to sleep disturbances and heart problems when it requires total joint replacement surgery. And the clinical implication, according to Fitzpatrick, is that test results should not determine whether or not to move forward with a possible hip osteoarthritis diagnosis.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy