LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Pacira, FDA Resolve Lawsuit: Good News for EXPAREL
Company News

Pacira, FDA Resolve Lawsuit: Good News for EXPAREL

December 18, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Pacira, FDA Resolve Lawsuit: Good News for EXPAREL
Courtesy of Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Secondary

Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has “made nice” with the FDA. The company has, according to the December 15, 2015 news release, “achieved an amicable resolution with the United States in its lawsuit (filed on September 8, 2015). The resolution confirms that EXPAREL (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) is, and has been since 2011, broadly indicated for administration into the surgical site to provide postsurgical analgesia.”

“In September 2014, the FDA Office of Prescription Drug Promotion issued Pacira a Warning Letter related to certain promotional materials.” That letter has officially been formally withdrawn via a “Rescission Letter.”

“We are pleased to announce a successful collaboration with the FDA to resolve this matter in an expeditious and meaningful way that allows us to get back to the important task at hand—reducing postsurgical opioid exposure by providing a non-opioid option like EXPAREL to as many patients as appropriate, ” stated Dave Stack, CEO and chairman of Pacira. “This is especially important given the burgeoning U.S. opioid epidemic, underscored by the reality that one in 15 patients will go on to long-term use after receiving an opioid in the hospital setting.”

Asked what was especially challenging about this Warning Letter/legal) process, Stack told OTW, “The most challenging aspect of this process was our hampered ability to educate surgeons about important considerations related to the recommended administration technique with EXPAREL to achieve optimal results. We’ve learned that the total volume to which EXPAREL is expanded, the use of appropriate adjunctive medications, and the adequate distribution of EXPAREL throughout the surgical site and neuroanatomy are key factors in achieving optimal results, particularly in orthopedic procedures such as total knee arthroplasty. If any of those factors are overlooked, there is an increased potential for patients to receive suboptimal pain relief.”

“There are a few significant takeaways from this resolution agreement. First, the FDA has officially withdrawn the Warning Letter issued in September 2014 and reaffirmed that EXPAREL is, and always has been, broadly approved for “administration into the surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia” in a variety of surgeries not limited to those studied in pivotal trials. Second, significant changes to the EXPAREL Package Insert were made to help clarify the broad indication for EXPAREL, and—of specific importance to orthopedic surgeons—the FDA has provided guidance on admixing EXPAREL with bupivacaine HCl, which should help further optimize treatment outcomes. We are quite pleased with the outcome of this successful collaboration with the FDA and look forward to a renewed focus on engaging with healthcare providers to advance patient care.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy