LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Gene Variations Associated With Osteonecrosis in Young Leukemia Patients
Spine

Gene Variations Associated With Osteonecrosis in Young Leukemia Patients

December 11, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Gene Variations Associated With Osteonecrosis in Young Leukemia Patients
Osteonecrosis in the Humerus / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Jmarchn
Secondary

Researchers from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and Children’s Oncology Group investigators have released new findings indicating that variations in genes involved in normal bone development are associated with an 8-to 15-fold increased risk for osteonecrosis in young patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

According to the December 5, 2015 news release, “osteonecrosis is a major side effect of ALL treatment with chemotherapy. About 15% of ALL patients develop the complication, which is caused by reduced blood flow to bones in the hips and other joints and leads bone to break down faster than it is replaced. For patients, the results may include stiffness, pain, disability and joint-replacement surgery. ALL patients aged 10 to 20 years old are at particularly high risk for osteonecrosis.”

“Researchers used genome-wide association studies to check the DNA of 1, 186 ALL patients less than 10 years old for single changes in the 3.2 billion ‘letters’ or chemical bases that make up the human genetic code…Researchers checked for genetic variations that were more common in 82 young ALL patients who developed osteonecrosis than in 287 who did not. The screening was then repeated with an additional 817 ALL patients younger than 10 years old. The patients were treated in clinical trials of the Children’s Oncology Group, an international clinical trials group focused exclusively on pediatric cancer.”

“The goal of this and earlier studies is to identify and understand genetic and other risk factors for osteonecrosis so we can identify patients at high risk for the side effect and develop interventions to prevent the disease, ” said first author Seth Karol, M.D., a St. Jude Physician Scientist Training Program fellow.

Dr. Karol told OTW, “Therapy associated osteonecrosis has become a major limiting toxicity for the treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the most common cancer of childhood. The reasons that some children develop osteonecrosis while others who get identical treatment do not remain incompletely understood. Our study hypothesized that inherited genetic variation may increase the risk of osteonecrosis, and that understanding the genetic predisposition in children less than 10 years (who are otherwise at low risk of developing osteonecrosis) may help us better understand osteonecrosis in all children.”

“We found inherited genetic variations in genes linked to bone and fat development, as well as in genes linked to glutamate receptor signaling, which increased the risk of developing osteonecrosis. We hope that future research building on these findings will allow us to better predict, prevent, and treat osteonecrosis and prevent the severe complications (including joint collapse requiring joint replacement) these patients sometimes suffer.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy