LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/FDA Approves New Uses for Infuse
Spine

FDA Approves New Uses for Infuse

December 11, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Approves New Uses for Infuse
Infuse Bone Graft / Courtesy of Medtronic plc
Secondary

Medtronic plc’s Infuse bone graft has been granted Supplemental FDA Approval for three additional spine surgery indications.

The company expects to begin marketing the expanded indications in early calendar year 2016. With this expanded approval, the company said on December 11, 2015, that it will be able to market the bone graft for use with certain spine implants made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) procedures.

New Indications

The indications for use are:

  • Use in OLIF51 Procedures with certain sizes of the PEEK Perimeter Implant at a single level from L5-S1.
  • Use in OLIF25 Procedures with certain sizes of the PEEK Clydesdale Implant at a single level from L2-L5.
  • Use in ALIF procedures with certain sizes of the PEEK Perimeter Implant at a single level from L2-S1.

Peter Whang, M.D., FACS, an associate professor in the Department of Orthopaedics at the Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, said, “For my anterior and anterolateral lumbar spine fusion cases, the use of Infuse Bone Graft allows me to reliably obtain a solid arthrodesis without having to harvest bone from the patient’s own hip which generally requires a second incision, results in significant pain, and increases the risk of complications such as bleeding or infection.” He added that he believes that “the proven osteoinductive properties of Infuse Bone Graft are particularly beneficial when used in conjunction with PEEK interbody spacers and the less invasive OLIF technique, which circumvents the psoas muscle and minimizes disruption of the surrounding soft tissues and neural structures.”

Infuse

Infuse is used with certain Medtronic interbody fusion devices to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease. The company says the active ingredient in Infuse—rhBMP-2—is a manufactured version of a protein already present in the body that promotes new bone growth. During surgery, it is applied to an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS). The ACS is a carrier to deliver the rhBMP-2 to the implant site and acts as a scaffold for the formation of new bone, and it will resorb, or disappear, over time.

OLIF Procedure

Advertisement

According to the company, the OLIF25 procedure helps surgeons preserve the patient’s psoas muscle when treating the L2-L5 levels of the spine. Additionally, the procedure gives surgeons “easier access around the patient’s iliac crest – enabling placement of an implant into the disc space for anterior column support.” The OLIF51 Procedure provides lateral access to the L5-S1 disc space and doesn’t require surgeons to flip the patient from an anterior position during surgery.

The graft is not indicated for use with a trans-psoas surgical approach.

Infuse has been one of the most controversial products used off label in the spine. The company has been sued, maligned and accused of paying off surgeons to misrepresent clinical results. None of the accusations have stood up to independent scrutiny. With supplemental approval of these expanded indications, the company continues to build on the incremental progress of demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of the product.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy