LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Seven Years of Data for Prestige LP Cervical Disc
Spine

Seven Years of Data for Prestige LP Cervical Disc

November 9, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Seven Years of Data for Prestige LP Cervical Disc
Prestige LP Cervical Disc / Courtesy of Medtronic plc.
Secondary

Patients return to work faster after being implanted with Medtronic plc’s Prestige LP Cervical Disc than when they had a fusion, according to new seven-year data.

Matthew Gornet, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon at the Orthopedic Center in St. Louis, Missouri, presented the data at the recently completed North American Spine Society meeting in Chicago, Illinois.

“The seven-year results of this study show that patients receiving cervical disc replacement maintain motion and quality of life, ” said Gornet. “At 24 months, Prestige LP patients demonstrated statistical superiority in overall success, and we see that trend continue in this seven-year data.”

Study Results

A single-arm study of the Prestige compared seven-year results from 211 investigational patients and 182 historical control ACDF (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion) patients. Key findings at seven years include:

  • Patients exhibited a statistical improvement in overall success (74.9%) compared to patients treated with ACDF (63.2%).
  • Patient-reported pain outcomes, such as Neck Disability Index (NDI), were statistically similar between the groups.
  • Patients maintained 6.9 degrees of mean angular motion at the treated level.
  • Median return to work time for Prestige LP patients was 40 days, compared to 60 days for fusion patients.
  • Device-related adverse events were similar in both groups.

Prestige LP Cervical Disc

The disc is the third artificial cervical disc approved for the company’s portfolio. The company said it is the only disc maker that offers cervical discs that are proven statistically superior in overall success at 24 months for a single-level indication.

The low profile disc has a ball-and-trough design and moves in a range of motions, including bending, rotation and translation. Risks with the disc, according to the company, include: bone formation (including heterotopic ossification) that may reduce spinal motion or result in a fusion, either at the treated or at adjacent levels. The company says the disc’s titanium ceramic composite design has been shown to have a lower wear rate than stainless steel in mechanical testing and produces less MRI scatter than cobalt chrome (MR Conditional at 3 Tesla).

Medtronic originally introduced the disc in 2007 and received FDA approval in July 2014. Four other cervical discs have been approved by the FDA since 2012. Globus Medical, Inc.’s Secure-C and NuVasive, Inc.’s PCM were approved in 2012 and LDR received two approvals in 2013 for its Mobi-C for single and two-level applications.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy