LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/FDA Clears Interventional Spine’s Opticage Device
Spine

FDA Clears Interventional Spine’s Opticage Device

November 18, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Clears Interventional Spine’s Opticage Device
Opticage / Courtesy of Interventional Spine
Secondary

Interventional Spine, Inc, a privately held company based in Irvine, California, reports the receipt of FDA clearance of their next generation expandable interbody fusion device called Opticage.

Company officials say that the new Opticage features an improved ability to deliver graft material through the implant after expansion, has a new streamlined profile and improved ergonomics.

Interventional Spine plans to provide several sizes of the new design in sterile packaging to address the most commonly used surgical approaches to spinal fusion. Since the market release in mid-2012 of the original Opticage, the company claims that there have been close to 2, 000 implants worldwide “with exceptional clinical results.”

Interventional Spine Chief Executive Officer Walter A. Cuevas said: “This represents another milestone for Interventional Spine as we continue to bring innovative surgical solutions to the spine market to address the needs of patients and surgeons worldwide.” He added that Interventional Spine expects to begin shipping the new Opticage in January 2016.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy