LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Smoking Tied to Knee Revisions
Large Joints and Extremities

Smoking Tied to Knee Revisions

October 3, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Smoking Tied to Knee Revisions
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Fae
Secondary

Another reason to quit or not to start. Smoking is associated with a threefold risk of revision after knee replacement. Smoking is THE most important factor associated with an increased risk of revision following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), according to MedPage contributing writer, Pam Harrison.

A study conducted at the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York and led by orthopedic surgery resident and former Harvard Medical School research associate, Benedict Nwachukwu, M.D., MBA, reviewed data for 436 patients who had undergone TKA over a 13 year period.

Men were more likely to have had a revision than were women but old age was associated with a 17% lower risk of requiring a revision, for each five-year increment increase in age.

The mean age of the patients studied was 57.8 years while that for the controls was 65.4. Osteoarthritis was the predominant reason given for a TKA in both study groups. Infection was the most common reason for revision at 30% followed by aseptic loosening at 18%, stiffness at 18%, and instability at 13%.

According to Harrison, the researchers noted that cigarette smoke has been shown to disrupt osteointegration, which is a fundamental process in the longevity of implanted materials. Nicotine has also been found to inhibit secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, another critical cytokine for bone remodeling.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy