LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/LinkSPINE: First U.S. Implantation of FacetLINK HEMI
Spine

LinkSPINE: First U.S. Implantation of FacetLINK HEMI

October 21, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

LinkSPINE: First U.S. Implantation of FacetLINK HEMI
FacetLINK HEMI and Massimo Calafiore / Courtesy of LinkSPINE
Secondary

LinkSPINE has announced the first U.S. implantation of the FacetLINK HEMI. According to the October 9, 2015 news release, the titanium HEMI device is a low-profile plate that cross connects a Transfacet pedicle screw on the ipsilateral side of a Micro-Decompression to a Translaminar pedicle screw on the contralateral side. It is designed to provide rigid bilateral fixation through a tissue sparing, unilateral decompression approach.

Faheem Sandhu, M.D., professor of Neurosurgery and director of Spine Surgery at Medstar Georgetown Hospital, performed the first U.S. HEMI case at Medstar Southern Maryland Hospital in Clinton, Maryland. “As a neurosurgeon focused on minimally invasive spine surgery, I will often perform a microsurgical decompression through a unilateral approach and use the ‘crossover technique’ to decompress the contralateral recess, ” explained Dr. Sandhu. “This approach enables me to address bilateral symptoms through a small exposure and to keep the posterior ligamentous structures completely intact. The HEMI’s ability to secure robust bilateral fixation through this microsurgical decompression is an attractive feature to me. The patient is doing great in the early post-operative period.”

LinkSPINE President Massimo Calafiore stated, “The FacetLINK platform is designed to fit within the bounds of a surgeon’s preferred decompression exposure, requiring no additional dissection beyond what was planned for the decompression itself. The HEMI requires only two screws to secure a low profile one level construct versus four screws which are needed when using conventional pedicle screw instrumentation.”

As indicated in the news release, “The Facet-Link Stabilization Platform is intended to stabilize the spine as an aid to fusion through immobilization of the facet joints. The system is indicated for use with bone graft, at single or multiple levels, from L3 to S1 (inclusive). The platform is indicated for the treatment of spondylolisthesis, degenerative disc disease (DDD) as defined as back pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degeneration of the facets with instability.”

Mr. Calafiore told OTW, “The HEMI device is a less invasive fixation implant that is designed for placement with a minimal amount of fluoro. Given its small size and low profile, the bilateral fixation the HEMI provides is impressive.”

“FacetLINK forms the foundation of LinkSPINE’s ‘Midline Choice’ implant platform. Additional products are under development which will integrate with FacetLINK to provide intra-operative flexibility to choose a less invasive stabilization construct based upon patient pathology, anatomy, and surgeon preference. We will continue to focus upon patient outcomes and surgeon feedback to guide our product development efforts.”

A company spokesperson stated: “We are grateful and extremely honored to be chosen as a winner in the minimally invasive spine surgery category for the 2015 Orthopedics This Week Spine Technology Awards. Our focus has been and will remain upon the patient, and continuing to develop simple, elegant solutions that reduce surgical morbidity and improve outcomes. We are excited about the opportunity to continue innovating toward a comprehensive “Midline Choice” platform that offers the surgeon a robust set of implant choices that can be tailored to various anatomical and pathological scenarios.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy