LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Insurer Pays clients for Shopping Around
Company News

Insurer Pays clients for Shopping Around

October 2, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Insurer Pays clients for Shopping Around
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Frei Sein
Secondary

Priority Health of Grand Rapids, Michigan, a health insurer, is giving its patrons a cash incentive to shop around for medical procedures. Awards range from $50 to $200 for choosing a less expensive option on 300 common health procedures. According to Karen Bauffard of the Detroit News, selecting a less-costly knee replacement surgery, hysterectomy or rotator cuff repair can result in a gift to the patient of a $200 Visa gift card from the health insurer—while also saving on deductibles.

Bauffard writes that the program is an attempt to make consumers more conscious of health care costs and provide incentives to health providers to make their procedures more cost transparent. Insurers are finding that employers and individuals are shifting to high-deductible insurance plans in order to reduce their monthly premiums.

Bauffard reports that other state insurers, including Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, which does not have a program like Priority’s, is watching to see if there is more demand for this approach. Priority has paid out more than $40, 000 in rewards since launching the Priority Rewards program two months ago, writes Bauffard who says that members earn $5 just for viewing the prices with a cost comparison tool at priorityhealth.com.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy