LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/People In The News/Stryker Restructures – Subrahmanian Leaves
People In The News

Stryker Restructures – Subrahmanian Leaves

September 25, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Stryker Restructures – Subrahmanian Leaves
Ramesh Subrahmanian/Stryker Corporation

Ramesh Subrahmanian is leaving Stryker Corporation.

Effective December 31, 2015, Subrahmanian will no longer serve as Group President, International, “as a consequence of a restructuring of the company’s international group, ” stated a company September 17, 2015 SEC regulatory filing.

He’ll stay on in an advisory role for three months following his departure and continue to receive his current compensation and benefits.

In addition, the regulatory filing said he will be eligible for an incentive payment of $99, 187.50 for the advisory period and will receive a severance payment in the amount of $396, 750.00 payable in 18 semi-monthly installments during the last nine months of 2016 and a lump sum payment of $275, 000.00 on or before March 15, 2016.

Subrahmanian has been on assignment in Singapore and will also be entitled to receive relocation benefits.

Former Stryker CEO, Stephen MacMillan hired Subrahabnian away from Merck & Co. in 2011 to beef up less than stellar international sales. He had spent 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry where he held various senior level jobs. In addition to Merck, he worked for Sanofi-Aventis and Hoechst Marion Rousel Ltd.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy