LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Found! Gene Responsible for BMD and Fracture Risk!
Large Joints and Extremities

Found! Gene Responsible for BMD and Fracture Risk!

September 17, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Found! Gene Responsible for BMD and Fracture Risk!
Humeral Fracture / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Bill Rhodes
Secondary

Genetic wizards from Hebrew SeniorLife Institute for Aging Research (IFAR), a Harvard-affiliated institution, worked with scientists from a number of international institutes to identify a genetic variant regulating a gene responsible for bone mineral density and fracture risk. Findings from this study—funded in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)—are published in the journal Nature.

“Our study explores the hereditary aspect of osteoporosis by investigating the role our genes play in determining bone mineral density and who is at risk of fracture due to low bone density, ” explains senior author Douglas Kiel, M.D., M.P.H., Director of the Musculoskeletal Research Center at IFAR, Hebrew SeniorLife in Boston, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Associate Member of the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, in the September 15, 2015 news release. “Understanding the genomics underlying skeletal fragility (osteoporosis) may lead to preventative interventions that ultimately reduce fractures as we age.”

As indicated in the news release, “For the present study, the research team sequenced the entire genome of more than 2, 800 people and combined this with exome sequencing as well as another 3, 500 people with “deep imputation” of their genotyping results, which is a way to fill in information about the unanalyzed portions of the genome by incorporating the data coming from the 2, 800 people with sequencing of their genomes. The results confirmed that some of the genetic variants were associated with bone mineral density by comparing their data with information from more than 20, 000 other research participants. The investigators then looked at data from many other studies (totaling more than half-a-million people) and determined that some of these variants also influenced a person’s risk of breaking a bone.”

“Study results show that a gene involved at the earliest stages of human development, the engrailed homeobox-1 gene, plays a central role in regulating bone density. This is the first time that researchers have connected the gene’s product, the protein EN1, to bone biology in adults. Furthermore, this study validates the use of whole-genome, sequencing-based discovery and deep imputation as sound methods for identifying novel genetic associations.”

Dr. Kiel noted, “Our findings enhance understanding of the genetics underlying the development of osteoporosis. Ideally, genomic research will one day lead to more personalized interventions (precision medicine) that, in this case, will reduce bone loss and prevent fractures in older adults.”

Dr. Kiel told OTW, “The goal of studies like these is to discover potentially new pathways that may be used to develop new treatments for osteoporosis. The next step would therefore be to better characterize the protein produced by the EN1 gene and to determine if molecules can be developed to favorably influence this pathway to increase bone strength. At this stage, orthopedic surgeons will not be able to apply any of the findings to clinical practice. It is too early in the research pipeline.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy