LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/FDA Clears Xtant Medical’s Bone Putty
Spine

FDA Clears Xtant Medical’s Bone Putty

September 3, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Clears Xtant Medical’s Bone Putty
Courtesy of Xtant Medical
Secondary

Xtant Medical Holdings Inc., a company in Belgrade, Montana, whose subsidiary, Bacterin International, Inc. makes regenerative medicine products has received FDA 510(k) clearance for its OsteoSelect PLUS. The product is a demineralized bone matrix, comprised of OsteoSelect Putty but with the demineralized cortical chips.

Adding cortical chips to OsteoSelect putty eliminates the need to mix bone chips and demineralized bone matrix (DBM) putty intra-operatively, saving time and reducing graft variability.

“We are very pleased with the FDA’s decision to approve [sic] OsteoSelect PLUS for marketing and distribution, ” said Gregory Juda, Bacterin’s chief scientific officer. “We developed this next generation bone graft material in response to surgeon demand using design input from surgeon customers…. This is the first 510(k) approval [sic] for Bacterin International since becoming a subsidiary of Xtant Medical.”

Xtant Medical Holdings develops, manufactures and markets regenerative medicine products and medical devices for domestic and international markets.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy