LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Robots Make Mistakes Too
Large Joints and Extremities

Robots Make Mistakes Too

July 24, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Robots Make Mistakes Too
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Obsidian Soul
Secondary

Fearful that robots may be taking over? Relax. It is not happening yet. A study by researchers from the University of Illinois at Urbana, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Rush University Medical Center found “a non-negligible number of technical difficulties and complications” during procedures performed by robots. The report is titled “Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery.”

Researchers examined 10, 624 events that were related to the use of robotic systems and instruments. Of these, they found that 1, 535 had adverse results with negative impacts on patients. In 1, 391 cases there were injuries to patients. In 144 cases deaths resulted. Malfunctions of the robot device accounted for 9, 061 of the cases. Cardiothoracic and head and neck surgery had the highest rates of injury or death, according to the report.

Investigators attributed the problems to the complexity of the procedures, the infrequent use of robotic devices and less expertise in using robotic instruments. They wrote, “some of the reported events could be prevented by employing substantially improved safety practices and controls in the design and operation of surgical systems.”

They noted that “As healthcare professionals increasingly use computer consoles and robotic tools in care, it is creating a need for a more tech-savvy workforce in the industry.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy