LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/Older Patients With Spinal Cord Injuries Less Likely to Receive Surgery
Spine

Older Patients With Spinal Cord Injuries Less Likely to Receive Surgery

July 27, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Older Patients With Spinal Cord Injuries Less Likely to Receive Surgery
Source: Flickr and Fran Urbano
Secondary

New research from St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto is indicating that older patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries are less likely to receive surgery compared with younger patients. And the bad news doesn’t end there…these patients also experience a significant lag between injury and surgery.

The research team utilized data from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry, a database containing information on 1, 440 individuals who had a traumatic spinal cord injury. Of the total, 167 (11.7%) were aged 70 years or older.

According to the July 6, 2015 news release, “These patients were more likely to have fallen compared with younger patients (83.1% vs. 37.4%) and to have a longer stay in an acute care hospital, according to the paper published today in the Canadian Medical Association Journal. Younger patients were more likely to have severe injuries resulting in paralysis below the trauma site whereas older patients had less severe injuries. The time between injury to arrival at an acute care center was about twice as long for older patients than younger patients. Once admitted, older patients also waited about twice as long for surgery as younger patients.”

“These delays may be due to delays in recognizing the less severe injuries in seniors or they may reflect a potential age related therapeutic bias, ” said study author Dr. Henry Ahn.

The researchers also found that older patients were also significantly more likely to die from a traumatic spinal cord injury than younger people. “These significant differences in injury demographics, timing of surgery and outcomes in older compared with younger patients necessitates rethinking the management of traumatic spinal cord injury in those in the oldest age group, ” Dr. Ahn said.

Dr. Ahn told OTW, “We were surprised with where the delays in treatment occurred. Elderly patients, on average, took twice as long to get transferred to a spinal center compared to a younger patient. These delays can hinder timely care for these patients, during which time patients are often immobilized, increasing their risks of adverse events such as blood clots and pneumonia related to being immobilized. The study did not assess exactly why these delays occurred. Recent studies have shown early surgery maybe better for neurologic recovery in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injuries.”

As for how long it might take before this could be available for widespread use, Dr. Ahn commented to OTW, “Future studies are being set up to plot out factor affecting transfer times and timing for surgery in hospital. From this, specific interventions such as education and guideline changes can be implemented.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy