LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Exercise Cuts Mortality 40% – New 6, 000 Patient Study
Sports Medicine

Exercise Cuts Mortality 40% – New 6, 000 Patient Study

June 12, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Exercise Cuts Mortality 40% – New 6, 000 Patient Study
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Gorzaak
Secondary

A study, published in the May British Journal of Sports Medicine, involving 6, 000 Norwegian men born from 1923 to 1932 found that exercise late in life allows them to live longer. “Even in the elderly, there is a lot to gain by being moderately active as compared to being sedentary, ” said the study’s lead author, Dr. Ingar Holme, professor emeritus at the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences in Oslo.

The study found that increasing physical activity benefited life span as much as did quitting smoking. The men in the study had a check on their health in 1972 and again in 2000. Altogether, they were monitored for about 12 years. Holme reported that 51% of men who were sedentary in their 70s died from any cause compared with one quarter of those who were moderately to vigorously active.

Moderate exercise consisted of exercise sports or heavy gardening for at least four hours a week. Vigorous exercise involved hard training or competitive sports several times a week. “Just 30 minutes of moderate activity six days a week was associated with a 40% lower risk of death. More exercise reaped greater benefits, decreasing the odds of death from heart disease or any cause, ” the researchers said. Men who were sedentary in their 40s lived five fewer years on average than those who were the most active.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy