LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Cytokine Identified as Factor in Cartilage Damage
Large Joints and Extremities

Cytokine Identified as Factor in Cartilage Damage

June 18, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Cytokine Identified as Factor in Cartilage Damage
Macroscopical joint lesions in sows. a: Cartilage erosion (arrows) on the medial humeral condyle. b: Cartilage ulceration (arrow) on the medial femoral condyle. c: Cartilage repair (arrow) of the medial femoral condyle d: Marginal osteophytes (arrows) on processus anconeus of ulna./Wikimedia Commons and Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Secondary

New research from the Netherlands indicates that a certain cell signaling protein—cytokine Interleukin-1β (IL-1β)—is critical in the development of blood-induced cartilage damage. Healthy human cartilage samples were cultured for four days in the presence or absence of 50% whole blood. Either IL-1β monoclonal antibody, IL-1 receptor antagonist, or TNF-α monoclonal antibody was added during blood exposure.

The June 12, 2015 news release stated, “The researchers found that adding IL-1β monoclonal antibody or IL-1 receptor antagonist resulted in a dose- and time-dependent protection of cartilage from blood-induced damage (early administration after blood-exposure was the most beneficial). In higher concentrations, almost complete normalisation of cartilage was achieved. In contrast, addition of TNF-α monoclonal antibody exhibited no effect on blood-induced cartilage damage.”

“As therapeutic agents opposing the activity of IL-1β are readily available, further research is now warranted to investigate whether an IL-1β antagonist would be effective in preventing and treating joint damage as a result of bleeding into the joint, ” said Dr. Simon Mastbergen, principle investigator from the University Medical Centre Utrecht, Netherlands. “Findings also suggest that the quicker treatment is initiated, the less damage to the joint may be sustained.”

Dr. Mastbergen told OTW, “The next step in investigating the efficacy of blocking IL-1 to prevent/treat joint damage upon bleeding is to perform in vivo studies as the influence of cytokines produced by synovial tissue needs to be integrated as well. In a model of posttraumatic osteoarthritis, opposing IL-1 is shown to prevent cartilage damage. However, in this model also mechanic factors induce damage.”

“Before human studies can be performed it is necessary to identify biochemical markers of joint damage to demonstrate turnover of cartilage tissue upon a joint bleed. A first step is made by identifying an increase in CS846 and CTX-II in haemophilia patients upon a joint bleed (Van Vulpen et al., Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2015), but studies in patients with a traumatic joint bleed need to be conducted. Identifying such markers is necessary to have tools to investigate the direct impact of a bleed on the joint as well as the effect of blocking IL-1 after a bleed on cartilage turnover.”

“It is important for orthopedic surgeons to realize the impact of blood on cartilage. The major impact of blood on proteoglycan turnover is a direct result of upregulation of cartilage-degrading enzymes as well as chondrocyte apoptosis and indirect effects by inducing synovial inflammation. As such, minimalizing the amount of blood exposure as well as the duration of blood exposure, either after trauma or major joint surgery, is important.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy