LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/VertiFlex’s Superion Interspinous Spacer Approved
Spine

VertiFlex’s Superion Interspinous Spacer Approved

May 28, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

VertiFlex’s Superion Interspinous Spacer Approved
Superion Interspinous Spacer System / Source: VertiFlex, Inc.
Secondary

The FDA issued a rare PMA Approval Order (pre-market approval) on May 26, 2015 as the agency approved VertiFlex, Inc.’s Superion Interspinous Spacer System. The FDA’s expert orthopedic panel recommended approval of the device back in February.

Least Invasive Spinal Stenosis Treatment

A statement from the company said the Superion has proven to be a “safe, effective and least invasive solution for the treatment of spinal stenosis, in a mostly Medicare-aged population.” The device is indicated for moderate lumbar spinal stenosis.

The device is designed to achieve indirect spinal decompression for patients suffering from neurogenic intermittent claudication due to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis. It is implanted minimally invasively through a cannula designed to be less traumatic to the patient. It can be implanted under general or local anesthesia.

Indication for Use

The proposed “Indication for Use” for the device, as stated in the PMA, is as follows:

Treat skeletally mature patients suffering from pain, numbness, and/or cramping in the legs (neurogenic intermittent claudication) secondary to a diagnosis of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis, with or without Grade 1 spondylolisthesis, confirmed by X-ray, MRI and/or CT evidence of thickened ligamentum flavum, narrowed lateral recess, and/or central canal or foraminal narrowing.

Patients with impaired physical function who experience relief in flexion from symptoms of leg/buttock/groin pain, numbness, and/or cramping, with or without back pain. The Superion ISS may be implanted at one or two adjacent lumbar (L) levels in patients in whom treatment is indicated at no more than two levels, from L1 to L5.

Advertisement

The company also noted several highlights of the device, including:

  • Largest, most robust IDE (investigational device exemption) trial for moderate lumbar spinal stenosis.
  • Demonstrated clinical success of >80% in all major components of the composite primary endpoint at 24 months, maintaining durability of effect through 36 months.
  • Patients exhibited similar leg pain improvement, as measured by VAS (Visual Analog Scale), compared to published literature on open surgical decompression.
  • Healthcare economic data demonstrated cost-effective equivalency to open surgical decompression.
  • Successful implantations in over 2, 000 patients around the world.

Avoiding Open Spine Surgery

The company’s co-Medical Director, Nick Shamie, M.D., Professor & Chief, UCLA Orthopaedic Spine Surgery, said, “As an early adopter of interspinous spacers, they have provided tremendous improvement for my patients suffering from lumbar stenosis. As a next-generation technology, Superion offers the potential for even greater clinical benefit, with the least invasive indirect decompression possible, and the ability for patients to avoid traditional open spine surgery.”

Compared to X-STOP

Clinical trials compared the Superion to Medtronic plc’s X-STOP. At 24-months follow-up, according to FDA documents, 52.7% of the Superion group and 50.2% of the X-STOP group were considered successful. However, study data showed spinous process fractures developed after treatment in 16.3% of Intent-to-Treat (mITT) subjects in the Superion ISS group and 8.5% of X-STOP mITT subjects. Earl Fender, company president and CEO, said after the February FDA panel meeting that the device “demonstrated clinical success of >80% in all components of the composite primary endpoint.”

The company did not note if there were any post-approval requirements to continue tracking patients from the original clinical trial.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy