LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Joint Replacements Reduce Cardio Risk 29%
Large Joints and Extremities

Joint Replacements Reduce Cardio Risk 29%

May 1, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Joint Replacements Reduce Cardio Risk 29%
Elderly Dance Off / Source: Wikimedia Commons and ianyou78
Secondary

Researchers from LivHOME, one of the nation’s largest professionally led at-home senior care companies, matched 153 older adults who suffered from severe arthritis to another 153 adults of the same age who did not have arthritis. They followed the two cohorts for seven years and were surprised at the results.

During the seven years they recorded 111 incidents of cardiovascular attacks including heart attacks, strokes, heart failure, by-pass surgery and angioplasty. Those study participants who had had a joint replaced were found to have a 40% less chance of having a cardiovascular attack. Those who had a joint replacement and had at least one risk of cardiovascular complication benefited from their joint replacement when researchers found that there was a 29% decrease in risk for a cardiovascular complication.

The investigators explained their findings by the change that took place in the individuals’ activity levels following a joint replacement. The pain from arthritis kept many from exercising. Those who got their joints replaced “got the feeling of rejuvenation, ” according to the authors. The getting of a joint replacement late in life “allows older adults to get the proper amount of exercise to reduce their risk of a heart attack, stroke, or any other cardiovascular complication, ” they wrote.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy