LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/High Volume Equals Safety in Surgery
Large Joints and Extremities

High Volume Equals Safety in Surgery

May 22, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

High Volume Equals Safety in Surgery
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Gobigrediufan
Secondary

Hospitals whose surgeons perform hundreds of surgeries annually have better patient outcomes than do those whose surgeons perform fewer. The data on this has become so pronounced and compelling that three of the top academic hospital systems in the U.S. plan to limit low volume surgeries. According to Zach Budryk, writing for Fierce Health Care, the hospital systems will no longer allow surgeons to perform procedures unless they have what administrators believe to be sufficient experience.

A report by U.S. News & World Report indicates that this is the first attempt to limit procedures as health systems generally give surgeons the right to perform any procedure listed within the scope of their training. The three systems have listed ten surgeries that carry higher mortality risks when performed by surgeons who only do them occasionally. Joint replacement is one of those surgeries.

Budryk noted that 1.3 million people a year in the U.S. undergo one or more of the ten procedures listed. About 264, 000 of them are performed at a hospital that would not meet the standards, according to John Birkmeyer, M.D., a surgeon and chief academic officer at Dartmouth-Hitchcock. Birkmeyer helped draft the standards with the help of Peter Pronovost, director of the Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality at Johns Hopkins University.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy