LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Government Spanks Medtronic Over Pain Pump
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Government Spanks Medtronic Over Pain Pump

May 5, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Government Spanks Medtronic Over Pain Pump
Source: RRY Publications LLC and Wikimedia Commons
Secondary

The FDA has stopped fooling around and on April 27, 2015 asked the U.S. Justice Department to file a complaint and proposed consent decree with a federal judge regarding Medtronic plc’s SynchroMed drug infusion system and the Neuromodulation quality system.

“Adulterated” Devices

The complaint alleges that Medtronic, its Chief Executive Officer Omar Ishrak and Senior Vice President Thomas Tefft, have been distributing medical devices in interstate commerce that are adulterated because they were not manufactured in accordance with current good manufacturing processes.

“Defendants are well aware that their practices violate the [Food, Drug and Cosmetic] Act, ” states the government filing. “FDA has repeatedly warned defendants, both orally and in writing, about their violative conduct.”

The company and government have agreed to resolve the allegations through the consent decree and Medtronic will be legally required to hire an outside expert to help correct the problems before manufacturing and selling any more of the devices. The decree outlines steps the company must take to address the FDA’s expectations. The company says its efforts are focused on “the implementation of design changes to address issues the company has previously communicated, and on enhancing the Neuromodulation quality system. The agreement also includes a defined process by which Medtronic can continue to provide physicians with access to the infusion system for patients.”

Repeated Warnings

The FDA issued the company three warning letters about quality control and manufacturing problems at its drug pump facility in Columbia Heights, Minnesota, between 2006 and 2013. The government said FDA inspectors visited the plant five times over that period. The inspections revealed significant violations of the quality system (QS) regulations, many of which related to design controls, complaint handling, and corrective and preventive action.

Medical devices such as the SynchroMed system are required to comply with FDA’s QS regulations. The complaint alleges that Medtronic repeatedly failed to correct QS regulations violations.

Advertisement

Treating Chronic Pain

The infusion pumps are implanted devices used primarily to treat chronic, intractable pain, severe spasticity and cancer. The medication is delivered through a catheter directly to the intrathecal space surrounding the spinal cord. Some Synchromed pumps had to be recalled because they could lose battery power and fail, endangering patients. In other cases, the devices could cause patients to receive too much or too little medication.

No Recalls

The company said there is no requirement to retrieve any Medtronic products and patients do not need to change their current course of therapy, have the pump removed, or take any other action as a result of this agreement.

“The proposed consent decree will require Medtronic and its leadership to commit to making changes in their process that will benefit the American public by ensuring that their products are safe and effective for patients, ” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “The Department of Justice will not permit medical device manufacturers to shirk their responsibility to ensure that the devices that patients rely upon are safe.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy