LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Six-Point Scale Predicts Joint Replacement Outcomes
Large Joints and Extremities

Six-Point Scale Predicts Joint Replacement Outcomes

April 13, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Six-Point Scale Predicts Joint Replacement Outcomes
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Dschwen
Secondary

Who is at risk for complications following joint replacement surgery and which patients will sail smoothly through the process without incident? Researchers at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania conducted two tests to find out.

In the first test, investigators examined the cases of 1, 012 patients who underwent primary total hip and knee replacement surgery over a 10-month period. They found that 70 patients had developed serious complications, most of which were cardiopulmonary in nature, including pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrhythmia. Of these, 11 suffered setbacks within 24 hours of their surgery, and 59 experienced complications just 24 hours later.

Doctors realized that if these 59 patients who experienced compilations had undergone same-day or short-stay surgery, and had been recovering at home when the complications occurred, they would have been at serious risk of injury.

As a result of the findings, the Penn team developed the six-point scale to determine a patient’s candidacy for same-day or short-stay total joint replacement. Patients without a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, or cirrhosis have only a 3.1% probability of developing late, serious complications following joint replacement surgery.

However, patients with just one risk factor have nearly a 10% risk of complication, a risk that is compounded by the addition of other risk factors. Thus, patients with even one of these risk factors should not undergo outpatient or overnight total hip and total knee replacement. Instead they should be admitted to the hospital for traditional-duration surgery and recovery.

In the second study doctors examined 738 patients who had undergone total hip and knee replacement and found that patients who required admission to intensive or critical care units after surgery were likely to have a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, or suffering blood loss of more than 1, 000 milliliters during surgery or requiring vasopressors during surgery.

Based on the findings, the investigators developed a weighted Penn Arthroplasty Risk Score to predict which patients would require intensive or critical care intervention after knee or hip replacement.

Gwo-Chin Lee, M.D., senior investigator on both studies and an assistant professor of orthopedic surgery said, “Total joint replacements are very common procedures, but they can also pose significant health risks to certain populations, such as seniors. These two studies have provided us with better, more systematic and accurate ways of predicting before and after surgery, which patients are at greater risk for complications, allowing us to more accurately assess their conditions, and determine the appropriate course of treatment, care, and rehabilitation.”

He added, “Given the increased national emphasis on quality metrics and the need to ensure patients recover well following joint replacements, there is a need to better identify and predict post-operative complications so we can intervene and provide timely follow-up care, ”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy