LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/DePuy Issues Safety Notice for LCS Knee System
Large Joints and Extremities

DePuy Issues Safety Notice for LCS Knee System

April 20, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

DePuy Issues Safety Notice for LCS Knee System
LCS Complete RPS Knee / Source: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Secondary

DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. issued a voluntary Field Safety Notice (FSN) for all lots of its LCS Complete RPS Knee System (LCS) this past March.

Higher Revision Rates

Australia’s regulatory body, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), had recently notified the company that based on information from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry; the system has a higher rate of revision when the native patella is not resurfaced than other unresurfaced knee systems. In fact, almost four times the rate. At four years, the LCS had a 12.9% revision rate versus 3.6% of other systems, when the patella was not resurfaced.

According to data from the registry, failure to resurface the patella has been associated with a higher incidence of postoperative patello-femoral pain, potentially leading to a secondary procedure. As a result, the company is warning against use of the LCS system without resurfacing the native patella.

The units affected since 2006, according to the Notice, include, “15, 571 LCS COMPLETE RPS Femoral Implants and 17, 732 LCS COMPLETE RPS Inserts sold in the U.S. and 3, 263 LCS COMPLETE RPS Femoral Implants and 3, 546 LCS COMPLETE RPS Inserts sold outside of the U.S.”

This device correction does not affect any other LCS complete knee femoral implants or inserts.

Intended Use

The LCS system is intended for total knee replacement and consists of a femoral implant and the compatible LCS insert. The LCS system is indicated for cemented use in cases of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. The RPS inserts and femoral implants are indicated where a higher than normal degree of post-operative flexion is required.

Advertisement

Corrective Action

The company said it is taking the following steps for this device correction:

  1. Advise users to resurface the patella with any of the LCS knee patella implants when implanting the affected implants.
  2. Revise product literature to include verbiage around the requirement to resurface the patella with any of the LCS implants when implanting the affected implants.
  3. Remind users that product complaints should be reported through the normal complaint reporting process.

Clinical Implications

If the system is implanted and the native patella is not resurfaced, the company says the patient may experience patello-femoral pain, potentially requiring a secondary procedure. Following are examples of possible risks/hazards of secondary procedures:

  1. Infection
  2. Additional scarring
  3. Neural and vascular damage
  4. Additional pain to the patient
  5. Functional problems resulting from items 1 – 4 above
  6. Anesthesia-associated risks

DePuy is not recommending prophylactic revision in the absence of symptoms. The company recommends that surgeons discuss potential clinical implications and risks with symptomatic patients that received the system with an unresurfaced patella.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy