LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Delirium Found in 48% of Hip Fracture Patients…and It’s Expensive!
Large Joints and Extremities

Delirium Found in 48% of Hip Fracture Patients…and It’s Expensive!

April 2, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Delirium Found in 48% of Hip Fracture Patients…and It’s Expensive!
Hip Implant / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Booyabazooka
Secondary

New research from the University of Toronto has found that 48% of hip fracture patients, age 65 and older, had delirium, or acute confusion, before, during and after surgery (perioperative), resulting in significantly longer hospital stays and higher costs for care. The study, recently presented at the 2015 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), found that perioperative delirium was associated with 7.4 additional hospital days.

According to the March 24, 2015 news release, “The patients with delirium had a mean age of 85, and were more likely to have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (“one” represents a “completely healthy fit patient, ” and “five, ” a patient not expected to live beyond 24 hours without surgery). After controlling for these differences, perioperative delirium was associated with $8, 282 ($8, 649 in U.S. dollars) in additional hospital costs (1.5 times the cost of patients who did not experience delirium). A significantly greater proportion of patients who experienced perioperative delirium required long-term and/or skilled care facility admission following their hospital stay (8% versus 0%).”

“Older patients are at high risk of developing delirium during hospitalization for a hip fracture, which is associated with worse outcomes, ” said orthopedic surgeon and lead study author Michael G. Zywiel, M.D. “Our work demonstrates that delirium also markedly increases the cost of elderly patient care while in the hospital. Given the high number of patients hospitalized every year with a hip fracture, there is a real need to develop and fund improved interventions to prevent in-hospital delirium in these patients.”

Dr. Zywiel told OTW, “We were particularly surprised to learn that almost 50% of these patients experienced delirium while in hospital. This was higher than we expected, and reinforces how easy it is to miss delirium if patients aren’t being routinely screened for it using validated methods.”

Regarding solutions, Dr. Zywiel commented to OTW, “The first step is to recognize the problem. We believe that this requires incorporating delirium screening as a routine part of ward care. The second step involves close coordination among all providers involved in the episode of care to proactively address all known modifiable factors that predispose to and precipitate delirium, because we know that treating delirium is far less effective than preventing it in the first place. At minimum this includes coordination between ER, geriatrics, hospitalist medicine, orthopedics, anesthesia, nursing, and rehabilitation teams. The list of evidence-based interventions is long, but includes: early regional pain control, minimizing systemic narcotics, minimizing delay to surgery, blood management techniques to reduce risk of transfusion, minimizing depth of sedation intra-op, avoiding intra-operative hypotension, limited use of Foley catheters, addressing polypharmacy and avoiding medications known to increase risk of delirium, ensuring availability of patient orientation aids (eyeglasses, hearing aids; clock, information board, window within view; regular visitation by family), early and frequent post-operative mobilization.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy