LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Massachusetts’ RomneyCare Boosted Joint Replacements
Large Joints and Extremities

Massachusetts’ RomneyCare Boosted Joint Replacements

March 6, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Massachusetts’ RomneyCare Boosted Joint Replacements
Mitt romney / Source: Wikimedia Commons and happyme22
Secondary

Passage in 2006 of the Massachusetts health care reform—known as RomneyCare—led to a 4.7% increase in joint replacement procedures, according to a report by health care researchers.

Jessica Bartlett, a reporter for the Boston Business Journal quoted Amresj Hganchate, the first author of the study who now works for the Section of General Internal Medicine at BMC, and the Healthcare Disparities Research Program in the Department of Medicine at Boston University School of Medicine, as saying “There may have been a pent-up demand for these procedures among racial/ethnic minorities and once these patient populations received insurance, they were able to move forward with the procedures.”

The highest increase in hip or knee replacements was among Hispanics who recorded a 37.9% increase. The next highest increase was among Blacks who had an 11.4% increase. Whites increased their use of the surgery by 2.8%. The report stated that lower income was not associated with a higher use of the procedures.

Hanchate said that prior to the reform legislation; Massachusetts had a relatively good safety net program for its citizens. “Our finding of differential post-reform changes among racial/ethnic groups may be because access to and use of free care prior to reform may not have been uniformly effective across the groups, ” he said.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy