LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Spine/High-Tech Monitor for Parkinson’s Patients
Spine

High-Tech Monitor for Parkinson’s Patients

March 5, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

High-Tech Monitor for Parkinson’s Patients
Basal GangliaIn Parkinsons Disease / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Mikael Haggstrom
Secondary

About 50 volunteers from Spain, Italy, Ireland and Israel, all with Parkinson’s, have been testing a portable monitoring system developed over a period of 5 years by a group of Portuguese researchers.

Called the Remmark System, the apparatus consists of a wearable movement sensor to monitor the patient’s gait, a headset, an automated medication pump and a phone to control the components, gather data and facilitate communication.

As explained by Varon Saxama in Pharma, when the sensors detect an abnormal gait, cues are sent to the patient via the headset that encourage the patient to walk to its rhythm, thus helping to regain a normal stride and pace. The device can detect falls and call for emergency assistance while the medication pump can be remotely controlled and activated for delivery of a rescue dose of medication. Finally, doctors can monitor the data in real time and use it to make adjustments to their patients’ medications or treatment plans. Portugal’s University Polytechnic of Catalonia developed the system.

The researchers plan to present the their results and those of volunteers’ testing at a workshop in Madrid in April.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy