LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/FORCE-TJR Surpasses Original Goal
Large Joints and Extremities

FORCE-TJR Surpasses Original Goal

March 31, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FORCE-TJR Surpasses Original Goal
Patricia Franklin, M.D. and David Ayers, M.D. / Courtesy: University of Massachusetts
Secondary

A mammoth four-year, $12 million national research effort—known as Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement (FORCE-TJR)—has surpassed its original goal and has become the most comprehensive U.S. database on total hip and knee joint replacement patients and their surgical outcomes. The project is funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

According to the March 23, 2015 news release, new research findings include information on the “timing of hip and knee replacement surgery—patient pain and disability scores now can be compared to national benchmarks. National benchmarks identified by FORCE-TJR data show that while there is remarkable consistency in the level of pain and disability among today’s TJR patients, those who wait too long, or have surgery too early, may not gain the highest level of improvement after TJR.”

Also noted are “Comparisons of patient risk factors and outcomes. FORCE-TJR data documents that post-surgery patient pain and function, and readmission rates, are influenced by a number of pre-operative patient risk factors. FORCE-TJR’s risk-adjustment methods account for varied patient factors so surgeons can, for the first time, compare their patients’ risk factors to national data and adjust, if needed, their patient selection criteria for optimal outcomes and patient care.”

“With this data, for the first time, we can compare patients’ physical outcomes with varied implants, surgical approaches and follow-up programs. We have benchmarks to use to see where our patients fall on a national spectrum both pre- and post-surgery, ” says David Ayers, M.D., co-lead of FORCE-TJR and chair of the Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation at UMass Medical School. “The data is invaluable for developing best practices.”

“The research on the original AHRQ-funded cohort will continue indefinitely as we implement annual follow-ups with those patients, ” says Patricia Franklin, M.D., principal investigator of the AHRQ grant and professor of Orthopedics and Quantitative Health Sciences at the UMass Medical School. “The data we’ve collected, and continue to add to, has the potential to directly influence clinical best practices, health care policy and the overall health and quality of life for more than 60 million people in the U.S. living with arthritis.”

Elise Berliner, director, Technology Assessment Program, Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, AHRQ, told OTW, “Force-TJR is a model for a patient centered approach where patients are considered partners in research. Because every aspect of the study was designed with this philosophy, including incorporating data collection directly from patients, the FORCE data collection method has been extremely successful. With a follow-up PRO (patient reported outcomes) return rate exceeding 85%, it far surpasses the rate of 20-30% seen in other similar registries. This has resulted in gathering previously unavailable data, especially on the under 65 population.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy