LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Brain Commands Move Prosthetic Hand
Large Joints and Extremities

Brain Commands Move Prosthetic Hand

March 27, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Brain Commands Move Prosthetic Hand
Ottobock Prosthetic Hand / Courtesy: Ottoback
Secondary

Ottobock’s prosthetic hand, with four movable fingers and a positionable thumb uses electrical signals originating in the brain to crate movement. The device has recently been cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for promotion in the U.S.

Called the Michelangelo Hand, users of the device say that it looks and feels like a real hand and has seven positions that enable it to manage a variety of tasks. “It’s the closest thing to a second hand I’ve had since I became an amputee 30 years ago, ” said attorney and Michelangelo user Andrew Carter in a statement to Fierce Medical Devices writer Stacy Lawrence.

The hand’s myoelectric controls work via an electrode that is placed on the surface of the wearer’s residual limb. Motors and microprocessors within the prosthetic hand create the gripping and rotating movements.

Carter added, “It’s designed to accommodate movements as fine as sorting money, transporting large objects or even performing delicate mechanical tasks. The prosthetic can help facilitate everyday tasks such as hanging clothes, holding a plate, cooking and riding a bicycle.”

Ottobock is the American corporate division of the German company Ottobock HealthCare, a firm with 7, 000 employees worldwide. The company offers 50, 000 different kinds of orthotic and rehabilitation products.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy