LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/Apple Watch Skips a Few Beats
Company News

Apple Watch Skips a Few Beats

March 13, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Apple Watch Skips a Few Beats
White Apple Watch with Screen / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Justin 14
Secondary

There may be a worm in Apple’s new ready-to-launch product. According to Susan Hall, writing for the Wall Street Journal, the sensors that measure skin conductivity and an electrocardiogram device that is intended to measure a wearer’s heart, are not working reliably on the Apple watch. So those features may be dropped from the watch for the time being.

While these sensors did not work well on people with hairy arms or too dry skin, neither were they successful in tracking blood-pressure or blood-oxygen levels in their wearers.

Hall explains that the Apple watch is designed to collect and then share medical data with the wearers’ healthcare providers. Despite these beginning glitches, few analysts doubt that “wearables, ” as they are called, will soon be close to the heart of future healthcare.

Fourteen major hospitals, according to Hall, have signed up with Apple to pilot its HealthKit platform and will track patient care in the expectation that the process will help lower operating costs. As many as 600 developers are working on health and fitness apps that they will integrate into the Apple program. Hall quotes Apple officials as saying that the company has a “moral obligation” to “do more” with wearable health monitors and similar devices.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy