LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/MedShape: 510(k) for Bone Tether Plate
Large Joints and Extremities

MedShape: 510(k) for Bone Tether Plate

February 6, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

MedShape: 510(k) for Bone Tether Plate
FastForward Bone Tether Plate / Source: MedShape, Inc.
Secondary

MedShape, Inc. has announced that the company has received FDA 510(k) clearance for its FastForward Bone Tether Plate, a product featuring the company’s latest technology platform: the 3D printing of medical grade titanium alloy “that allows for the fabrication of devices with complex and/or customizable geometries.”

The plate is the main component of the FastForward Bunion Correction System, “a new approach to surgically correct hallux valgus deformities that preserves and protects the native bone anatomy.” According to the February 2, 2015 news release, tethering suture material between the first and second metatarsals is one alternative bone-sparing approach to treatment. “However, peer-reviewed studies have reported the occurrence of second metatarsal fractures due to stress concentrations created by the suture-button implant and the requirement to drill through the second metatarsal.”

“The FastForward Bone Tether Plate represents a breakthrough in bunion correction by allowing suture tape to be securely and safely wrapped around the second metatarsal eliminating the need to drill through the bone. Thanks to the new 3D printing technology, the Bone Tether Plate is equipped with several unique design features including an overall geometry that closely matches the second metatarsal anatomy so that stresses are optimally distributed on the bone and a looped portion that allows suture tape to pass and securely hold the plate in place without the need for bone screws.”

MedShape has also received 510(k) clearance for its FastForward PEEK Screw System, to be used in conjunction with the Bone Tether.

“The FastForward system aligns with MedShape’s continued mission to develop and commercialize innovative medical devices from cutting edge materials and manufacturing technologies to address significant clinical needs, ” said Ken Gall, Ph.D., chief technology officer of MedShape and professor of Materials Science and Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. “We are in the early stages of tracking clinical outcomes with this new surgical approach and are excited to extend the 3D printing material platform towards the development of other implants.”

Dr. Gall told OTW, “In order to address the clinical demands associated with bunion procedures, it was important that we develop a device that would fit securely around the 2nd metatarsal while protecting the bone from large stress risers. By 3D printing the FastForward Bone Tether Plate, we were first able to design the plate with a geometry that aligns closely with the second metatarsal anatomy including side wings that help broadly distributing stresses across the bone. The second feature we were able to incorporate through 3D printing was a low profile loop on the top of the plate that suture tape can pass through to aid in fixating the plate to the bone without the tape coming in contact with bone and creating stress concentrations.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy