LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Joint Replacement Cost Variations Huge & Random
Large Joints and Extremities

Joint Replacement Cost Variations Huge & Random

February 11, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Joint Replacement Cost Variations Huge & Random
Source: Wikimedia commons and NASA Earth Observatory
Secondary

David Morgan, writing for Scientific American, reports that hip and knee joint replacements are subject to “huge and apparently random price variations within the same geographical area.”

His source is a Blue Cross Blue Shield study of claims in 64 healthcare markets over three years. The study found the largest price swings in hip surgery in the Massachusetts where the cost of the same sort of care varied by more than 313%. The low was $17, 910 and the high was $73, 987.

In Dallas, Texas, prices varied from $16, 772 to $61, 584, a difference of 267%. Morgan reported that the national average cost for a joint replacement is just over $30, 000 with the lowest price found in Alabama where a hip or knee replacement could be had for $11, 399.

The researchers who conducted the study, according to Morgan, looked at claims for more than 3, 000 procedures performed from 2010 to 2013. They described the variations as being “seemingly random” and called for “transparent pricing” in medicine.

Morgan reported that the data contained in the study reflects the money that both insurers and patients paid to hospitals, doctors, labs, physical therapists and whoever else were involved in the joint replacement procedures. The study estimated that knee replacements tripled between 1993 and 2009 and hip replacements doubled in the same time period.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy