LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/“State of Orthopedics” Sounding Good at DePuy Synthes
Company News

“State of Orthopedics” Sounding Good at DePuy Synthes

January 27, 2015 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

“State of Orthopedics” Sounding Good at DePuy Synthes
Image created by RRY Publications, LLC / Sources: DePuySynthes and RRY Publications
Secondary

Alex Gorsky, the chairman of Johnson & Johnson sounded like a happy man when he reported fourth quarter results on January 20, 2015.

His subsidiary, DePuy Synthes, showed 3% operational growth over the prior year and healthcare utilization rates in the U.S. increased for the second quarter in a row and are expected to keep rising. Gorsky told analysts that “governments are increasingly recognizing the need to continue to address healthcare needs and are taking steps to reward innovation through FDA and EMEA [European Medicines Agency] designations that are helping to speed product review times.”

In the U.S., Gorsky said there is probably the “clearest and the most tangible data” about utilization rates that he finds encouraging. “We think we’ve got about three quarters now in the positive, when I say in the positive I mean somewhere between 2% and 3% when we’re looking at hospital admissions [and] surgical procedures. Physician office visits still appear to be negative. So I think it’s too early to declare complete victory yet.”

He added that, in particular for medical devices, his company’s emphasis has been on “growth acceleration from innovation” and transforming their sales models to “better reflect the reality” that purchasing decisions are increasingly being made at the healthcare system level.

The “big focus” over the past year, he said, has been to make sure they’ve made the most of the significant investment made in Synthes. “And I think we made a lot of headway…. In fact I think we were one of the first companies to really look hard at spaces like orthopedics and recognize that consolidation was very likely to occur and so we were able to do that in a way where we feel we got a very good portfolio fit…. We feel that we’re in a very good position now particularly as many of our competitors are just starting to go through some of those consolidation initiatives.”

For the quarter, orthopedic sales of $2.441 billion declined slightly by 0.6%. A strong dollar cut 3.4% from reported sales.

" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/ryortho.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/State_DePuySynthes_4Q14Table_WEB.jpg?fit=730%2C194&ssl=1" src="https://i0.wp.com/ryortho.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/State_DePuySynthes_4Q14Table_WEB.jpg?resize=730%2C194&ssl=1" alt="Source: Johnson & Johnson" width="730" height="194">
Source: Johnson & Johnson

Orthopedics sales growth, according to management, was driven by sports medicine, hips, spine and knees. “The successful launch of MONOVISC coupled with the continued strong growth for ORTHOVISC drove results for sports medicine.” On a constant currency basis, hip growth of 5% worldwide was driven by strong volume growth partially offset by continued pricing pressure. Primary stem platform sales were a major contributor to the results. Spine grew 3% with solid market volume growth and new product launches partially offset by continued pricing pressure. Knees worldwide increased 3% due to the “successful launch of ATTUNE, ” with pricing pressure offset by positive mix.

Yes, the State of Johnson & Johnson and orthopedics looks good from where Chairman Gorsky sits.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy