LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/FDA Clears Think Surgical’s 3D Workstation
Large Joints and Extremities

FDA Clears Think Surgical’s 3D Workstation

January 5, 2015 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

FDA Clears Think Surgical’s 3D Workstation
TSolution One Surgical System / Courtesy: THINK Surgical, Inc.
Secondary

THINK Surgical, Inc., formerly the Curexo Technology Corporation, has received 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for its new TSolution One Surgical System for total hip arthroplasty (THA). The robotic system consists of two technologies. They are the Tplan 3D planning workstation and the TCAT computer-assisted tool. The two work together to bring about what the company calls “an exceptional degree of precision and accuracy” to total joint replacement surgery.

The TPLAN 3D workstation assists surgeons with preoperative planning by creating a 3D model of the patient’s anatomy based on CT images. Using the workstation tools the surgeon can plan an optimal fit and alignment for each patient.

According to the press release: “In the operating room, the surgeon uses the TCAT computer-assisted tool and the patient’s preoperative plan created by the surgeon to prepare the bone cavity and joint surface. Under the surgeon’s direct control, the TCAT system mills the bone with sub-millimeter accuracy to achieve optimal fit of the implant the surgeon chose for the patient’s joint replacement.”

According to company officials, “the Tsolution One core technologies have been used in thousands of total joint replacements for both hips and knees worldwide.” The company is based in Fremont, California.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy