LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Revision Surgeries Equal Six Percent
Large Joints and Extremities

Revision Surgeries Equal Six Percent

December 8, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Revision Surgeries Equal Six Percent
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Amakuha
Secondary

The first report is out from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) and it reveals that in 2013 6% of replacement operations were revision surgeries—most of them taking place within three months of the original surgery. Irvin Jackson, writing for About Lawsuits.com, notes that the data in the report covers only about 4.5% of joint replacement surgeries performed in the U.S. in 2013. He writes that “the number is expected to expand as more hospitals begin participating in the program.”

About 120 hospitals submitted data about 44, 000 joint surgeries performed in 2013 along with information about 80, 227 procedures that had been conducted since 2008. Jackson notes that the U.S. registry was launched after a similar but older registry established in the United Kingdom had detected that metal-on-metal implants were failing at rates up to 13%. Unfortunately, “the issues were not discovered until after hundreds of thousands of individuals had the defective implants placed in their body, ” he wrote.

“We are pleased to be publishing our first comprehensive report, ” said AJRR Board of Directors Chairman Dr. William J. Maloney. “The data in this report covers the collection and analysis of data related to hip and knee replacement procedures that have taken place from when we began collecting data up until December 2013.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy