LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Zimmer’s Periprosthetic Joint Infection Test Available in Europe
Large Joints and Extremities

Zimmer’s Periprosthetic Joint Infection Test Available in Europe

November 26, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Zimmer’s Periprosthetic Joint Infection Test Available in Europe
Joint Infection
Secondary

The first and only test specifically designed for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), is now eligible for sale in several European countries.

On November 19, 2014, Zimmer Holdings, Inc. announced its Synovasure Alpha Defensin test for PJI received Certificate of CE (IVD) Notification and European Authorized Representative (EAR) certificate. According to the company, with both certificates in place, Zimmer, in conjunction with its manufacturing partner CD Diagnostics, is now cleared to launch the test to an initial Tier 1 group of countries, including Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland and the UK.

Periprosthetic Joint Infection

According to a June 2010 Guidelines and Evidence Report approved by the Board of Directors of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), PJI can be caused by “entry of organisms into the wound during surgery, hematogenous spread, recurrence of sepsis in a previously infected joint, or contiguous spread of infection from a local source.”

The incidence of PJI after primary hip or knee arthroplasty is over 2% among the Medicare population and is higher after revision arthroplasty than after primary arthroplasty in both joints.

AAOS says PJI requires significant resources to diagnose and treat. Infection is a common cause of revision arthroplasty, with 15% of revision total hip arthroplasties and 25% of revision total knee arthroplasties being due to infection.

Zimmer: “Unparalleled Accuracy”

Matt Monaghan, Zimmer’s senior vice president of Global Hips and Reconstructive Research, says the product already delivers “unparalleled accuracy, performance and ease of use in the U.S., and we are very excited to make the same technology available to doctors and patients in Europe. By being able to accurately determine PJI within 10 minutes, the Synovasure PJI Test brings a new level of diagnostics to the European market.”

Advertisement

The “Unparalleled Accuracy” of the test, includes:

  • Achieving 97% sensitivity and 96% specificity by measuring synovial fluid alpha defensing.
  • Alpha defensin is an antimicrobial peptide released by neutrophils in response to pathogens.
  • Alpha defensin is an ideal biomarker for PJI due to the tremendous separation it achieves between positives and negatives.

Additionally, in performance results backed by data in a 158 patient study, the test maintained its performance in typically challenging situations such as:

  • Culture Negative Infection — where 14 of 38 patients with PJI were culture negative and the test correctly identified all 14 as infected.
  • Systemic Inflammatory Conditions — test studies included patients with systemic inflammatory disease and its performance was maintained in this population.
  • Antibiotic Therapy — where 27% of patients with PJI had been treated with antibiotics prior to aspiration and the Synovasure PJI was not adversely affected in this population.

AAOS Guidelines

The AAOS Guidelines and Evidence Report recommends erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein testing for patients assessed for periprosthetic joint infection. You can read the guidelines here.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy