LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Zimmer Gives Europeans More Time for Zimmer/Biomet Deal
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Zimmer Gives Europeans More Time for Zimmer/Biomet Deal

November 25, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Zimmer Gives Europeans More Time for Zimmer/Biomet Deal
Image created by RRY Publications, LLC / Source: Pixabay and Gerd Altmann
Secondary

The European Commission was supposed to make a decision on the ZimmerBiomet deal by March 11, 2015.

On November 18, 2014, Zimmer Holdings Inc. announced the company had agreed to extend the European deadline by a “limited number of days, ” and provide the European regulators with additional information.

In October, the Commission opened an “in-depth investigation” into the planned $13.35 billion merger with Biomet, Inc. The Commission said the deal could result in less innovation and higher prices.

Company officials continue to tell analysts that they expect the deal to go through in the first quarter of 2015.

“Deadline extensions are not uncommon in such in-depth investigations. Zimmer has been working closely with the regulatory authorities to facilitate their review of the pending transaction and is encouraged by the substantial progress that has been made to date in connection with the overall regulatory process. Zimmer continues to expect to close the transaction in the first quarter of 2015, ” stated the November 18 Zimmer announcement.

Unicompartmental Knees and Shoulder Divestitures?

When the Europeans announced their investigation in October, Wells Fargo analyst, Larry Biegelsen said that, according to his consultant, the review is still likely to be resolved through divestitures. The likely areas of divestiture, according to Biegelsen, are unicompartmental knees and shoulders, given the high combined market share.

Biegelsen pointed out that the EU antitrust regulators also launched an in-depth investigation into the Johnson & Johnson/Synthes merger on November 3, 2011, and that deal was cleared on April 19, 2012 after Johnson & Johnson agreed to divest its trauma business to Biomet.

Advertisement

The U.S. government has yet to approve the deal. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) requested additional information in July. The transaction remains subject to the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting periods under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, approval from the Japan Fair Trade Commission, as well as other customary closing conditions.

BofA Merrill Lynch analyst, Bob Hopkins said back in October that regarding the U.S. timelines, “based on past experience, generally if things go well, ” a second request may only take three months to turn, but that four to five months is more the norm.

“The possibility remains that the FTC could comment soon, but our conversations with FTC experts suggest FTC and EU regulators will likely coordinate the investigation to the extent permissible in order to reach agreement on any potential conditions placed on the deal. Coordination between the U.S. and EU could potentially push out the FTC ruling into early next year, ” writes Hopkins.

Both analysts believe the deal is still on track.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy