LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/America’s Joint Registry Issues First Report
Large Joints and Extremities

America’s Joint Registry Issues First Report

November 21, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

America’s Joint Registry Issues First Report
Courtesy: the American Joint Replacement Registry
Secondary

Thanks to the release of the first round of data from the American Joint Replacement Registry the United States is beginning to catch up with the UK and Australia who have had such registries for many years. In its report, Modern Healthcare noted that the registry is the “first step toward compiling data that could assist providers with assessing how medical devices perform.”

Hip and knee joint replacements are among the most performed surgeries in the U.S. The registry data on these replacements include information from only 120 hospitals or 383 hospital participants which represent approximately 4.5% of joint replacements that were done in 2013. The data reflects patients with both private insurance and Medicare coverage. For each surgery the registry records the implant type and its lot number. The Modern Healthcare report states that the registry has a goal of tracking 90% of the hip and knee surgeries performed in the U.S.

Data collected to date reveals that patients who had knee replacement surgeries had an average age of 66.7 while those who had hip surgeries were, on average, 67.6 years old. The Modern Healthcare writer indicated that the registry managers plan to collect more complex data in future years.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy