LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Study: Preop Physical Therapy Saves $1, 215 per Patient
Large Joints and Extremities

Study: Preop Physical Therapy Saves $1, 215 per Patient

October 13, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Study: Preop Physical Therapy Saves $1, 215 per Patient
Source: U.S. Navy photo by Journalist Seaman Erica Mater and Wikimedia Commons
Secondary

According to a new study that appears in the October 1, 2014 issue of the Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS), joint replacement patients who undergo preoperative physical therapy (PT) are saving “the system” money. As indicated in the October 7, 2014 news release, the researchers demonstrated that preop PT can reduce the need for postoperative care by nearly 30%, saving an average of $1, 215 per patient in skilled nursing facility, home health agency or other postoperative care.

Data was obtained for 4, 733 total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) patients (from Medicare claims). “Approximately 77% of patients utilized care services following surgery. Patients receiving preoperative physical therapy showed a 29% reduction in postoperative care use. In addition, 54.2% of the preoperative physical therapy group required postoperative care services, compared to 79.7% of the patients who did not have preoperative therapy.”

“The decline in postoperative care services resulted in an adjusted cost reduction of $1, 215 per patient, due largely to lower costs for skilled nursing facility and home health agency care. Preoperative physical therapy cost an average of $100 per patient, and was generally limited to one or two sessions.”

“This study demonstrated an important opportunity to pre-empt postoperative outcome variances by implementing preoperative physical therapy along with management of comorbidities before and during surgery, ” said orthopedic surgeon Ray Wasielewski, M.D., co-author of the study, in the October 7, 2014 news release. Dr. Wasielewski is a physician with OhioHealth in Columbus, Ohio.

Richard Snow, D.O., M.P.H., also with OhioHealth and was a co-author on the study. He told OTW, “We were surprised to find the magnitude of the effect that pre-operative physical therapy (POPT) had on the post-acute care, especially considering the number of visits. After thoughtful consideration, the authors agreed that the process of POPT is probably associated with other patient centered processes that providers are using that cumulatively have the effect on post-acute care utilization patterns.”

Asked about barriers to implementing preoperative physical therapy, Dr. Snow commented to OTW, “The major challenges to implementing this type of program are similar to challenges we all face with an increasing demand for delivery of value-based care. First is reducing the fragmentation that comes from the siloed approach to payment. Reengineering care to provide patient centered care across the continuum needs to be facilitated by reengineered payment allowing that care. Second is building the competencies necessary to do adequate pre-operative assessment, both physical and environmental, and building a joint expectation with the patient regarding post-acute recovery.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy