LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Surgeons Practice on 3-D Printed Skull

Surgeons Practice on 3-D Printed Skull

September 29, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Surgeons Practice on 3-D Printed Skull
Human Skull / Source: Wikimedia Commons and Magnus Manske
Secondary

A group of surgeons in the south of India were recently confronted with a three-year-old girl suffering from a condition called craniosynostosis—a premature ossification of the bones in an infant skull where the joints between the bones fuse together in an abnormal way. Unless it was surgically corrected, the girl’s brain growth and mental development would be drastically affected.

Before proceeding the doctors first conducted a CT scan and then converted it into a 3-D file, which they sent to a 3-D print maker in Mumbai. Using the additive process of a 3-D printer which melts countless thin layers of metal powder, one upon another using a laser, the company shaped a replica of the girl’s brain and her skull. It took them nine hours to complete it.

The surgeons from the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research used the replica to practice on. A writer for New Tech for Old India said, “In the emerging world of 3-D printed organs, using a 3-D printed skull to practice on before as major operation may not be such a fancy thing. But in a country with so few resources, this is a giant achievement.”

The leader of the surgical team, Dinesh Kumar, M.D. said, “We would have completed the operation by now, but the girl has contracted a respiratory infection, because of which we cannot give her anesthesia.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy