Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc., a privately held biotech company located in New York City, has licensed the rights to a new technology developed by a team of researchers at the Ansary Stem Cell Institute at Weill Cornell Medical College.
Biotech Firm Licenses Stem Cell Re-Programming Technology

The new technology provides a means of converting a patient’s own vascular cells (endothelial cells) directly into blood stem cells. The company explains that endothelial cells are acquired from a biopsied piece of skin and are then “educated” on a bed of VeraVecTM cells which are proprietary to Angiocrine Bioscience. According to the company’s press release, these treated cells form multipotent blood cells that are capable of producing red cells that carry oxygen, white cells that provide immunity, and platelets to prevent bleeding.
Shahin Rafii, M.D., director of the Ansary Stem Cell Institute, professor of medicine, genetic medicine and reproductive medicine, and a founder of Angiocrine Bioscience reported on this advance in the July 2 issue of Nature. His hope is that his team’s research would lead to therapies that originate from their own cells for blood disorder patients.
Rafii said, “We hope that our method will offer the first safe technology to treat a wide spectrum of serious disorders. The VeraVecTM cells form a nurturing niche for the survival and growth of the reprogrammed blood cells, similar to what happens developmentally during blood production. A particularly important aspect of this study was that the reprogrammed cells engrafted in the bone marrow when implanted into rodents and morphed into the various types of blood cells.”

Discussion
This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?
Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.
We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.
Join the conversation
Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.