LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Would Congress Let Traumatic Brain Injury Care for Vets Expire?
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Would Congress Let Traumatic Brain Injury Care for Vets Expire?

August 11, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Would Congress Let Traumatic Brain Injury Care for Vets Expire?
Wikimedia Commons and SSgt Robert Dea
Secondary

With time quickly running out before Congress’ month-long recess in August, lawmakers were able to keep a small but critical program to help veterans with traumatic brain injuries (TBI) funded.

Sadly, this critical program was already on life-support and Congress was about to let it expire. The recent scandals regarding the Veterans Administration (VA) treatment of veterans gave Congress and the President the political will to find funds to try to repair what’s broken at the VA.

Two legislators, in particular, grabbed the opportunity to slip in a provision that would keep this incredibly important TBI program funded. When this bill is signed into law, veterans living with TBI will be able to maintain their current level of care. The bill itself intends to better the VA health care system by expanding veteran access to private health care and by increasing the number of hospitals and medical staff who will treat the wounded warriors.

One of the invisible wounds of war, traumatic brain injury has affected more than 300, 000 American service members since 2000, according to Department of Defense reports. As improvised explosive devices detonated along roads and caught vehicle and foot patrols in their deadly fire, the head trauma experienced by wounded service men and women became the grim signature of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. To remedy the troubled Department of Veterans Affairs, Congress passed a bill to reform the VA and make efforts to rehabilitate veterans with TBI.

On Wednesday, July 30, the House of Representatives passed the VA reform bill with a 420-5 vote. The Senate passed the bill late on Thursday, July 31 with a 91-3 vote. President Obama signed the bill into law on Thursday, July 7 during an event at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Although the main focus of the bill is the $16.3 billion VA overhaul, the bill also includes measures to aid veterans living with TBI.

The additional measure, sponsored by Senators Cory Booker, D-N.J. and Dean Heller, R-Nev., extends a VA pilot program for veterans with TBI an additional three years. The pilot program provides assisted living and therapy to veterans who suffer from moderate and severe TBI. In 2011 when the program began at the behest of Congress, the VA committed 20 certified residential brain injury providers to make services available at 150 sites across the nation.

“It is about giving [veterans] their practical skills that they need to return to their communities and live independently, ” Booker said in support of the bill. “That is what is so special about this program.”

The pilot program has helped veterans receive 24-hour team-based care at these facilities. The staff rehabilitates the wounded warriors both physically, by helping them walk independently, and mentally, by assisting them with speech therapy and improving their memory. Although this program has helped countless veterans, it was to expire in October if Congress could not gather enough support

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy