Runners hurt their knees more often than they do any other part of their body. And the most common knee injury is patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Matt Fitzgerald, a training intelligence specialist for PEAR Sports, says that orthopedists used to believe that PFPS was associated with chondromalacia, or fissuring of the cartilage in the joint.
Hip Misalignment Cause of Knee Pain

Following the demise of that premise, Fitzgerald said that medical professionals speculated that the primary cause of PFPS is improper tracking of the patella during running. He now says that recent research shows that the most common cause of PFPS is a genu valgum, or “knock knee” effect that is related to weakness in the hip musculature.
Fitzgerald explains it this way. “At the stance phase of running, when one foot is in contact with the ground, the muscles on the outside of the hip must become active to prevent the body from tipping toward the unsupported side. If those muscles are not able to do their job properly, the leg goes into genu valgum to compensate.”
The University of Calgary enlisted 25 runners to participate in a study. Fifteen of the runners had PFPS and 10 did not. For three weeks, those with the sore knees participated in exercises designed to strengthen their hip abductors. The 10 runners who were not injured did not.
At the end of the study the injured runners found that their strength had increased, stride-to-stride knee joint variability was reduced, pain was reduced and there was no observed change in knee genu valgum among the injured runners.
While the study was small, the investigators were encouraged to learn that strengthening exercises for the hip abductors can alter runners’ knee joint kinematics in a way that reduces strain on the knee during running.

Discussion
This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?
Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.
We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.
Join the conversation
Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.