LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/TKR Time Reduced to 27 Minutes
Large Joints and Extremities

TKR Time Reduced to 27 Minutes

July 12, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

TKR Time Reduced to 27 Minutes
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Benoit Rochon
Secondary

Surgeons at Morriston Hospital, South Wales, have cut the time it takes to carry out total knee replacement (TKR) surgery by a third. Instead of the operation taking an average of 42 minutes, it can now be completed in just 27 minutes. “It is designed to increase efficiency and to get more replacements done. We were the first in the world to do this and now it is being adopted in East Kent and Aberdeen, ” said Mark Mullins, M.D.

Fellow surgeon David Woodnutt, M.D., who helped design the new system, explained, “Once we confirm the knee needs replacing the patient has an MRI scan and from that we generate a computer model of the knee. This then allows 3D printed jigs (cutting guides) to be made, improving the quality of surgery. All the planning is done in advance so there is a shorter operating time. This reduces the risk of complications and allows more cases to be done.”

The Morriston team has developed a new system whereby the amount of equipment needed to carry out knee replacement surgery has also been drastically reduced—saving turnaround time.

Mullins said that instead of using seven or eight big cases full of equipment to perform the operation they can do it with one or two as it is now specific to the individual patient. “That means that the inventory can be reduced. Sterilization costs are lower and there is less chance of equipment being damaged or contaminated, ” he said.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy