LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Sports Medicine/Ouch! Treating Groin Pain in Soccer Players
Sports Medicine

Ouch! Treating Groin Pain in Soccer Players

July 8, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Ouch! Treating Groin Pain in Soccer Players
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Lance Cpl. Alyssa Hoffacker
Secondary

Chronic exercise-related groin pain occurs in between 0.5% and 6.2% of all athletes but is especially common among soccer players where recent research has pegged the incidence rate at 10 to 18 injuries per 100 soccer players.

Nonoperative treatments often have limited efficacy and some studies have shown that only 38% of injuries resolve with nonoperative treatment alone. Surgical procedures on the adductor-abdomino complex can be more effective for alleviating symptoms. A recent study titled, “Adductor Tenotomy as a Treatment for Groin Pain in Professional Soccer Players” tackled this touchy issue.

Drs. Omer Mei-Dan, Vicente Lopez, Michael R. Carmont, Mark O. McConkey, Gilbert Steinbacher, Pedro D. Alvarez, and Ramon B. Cugat examined 155 professional and recreational soccer players between 2000 to 2006.

All subjects in this study were players with recalcitrant groin pain, both with and without lower abdominal pain. The players also exhibited a resistance to nonoperative treatment. Ninety-six of the study patients were treated with adductor tenotomy and 59 patients were treated with combined adductor tenotomy and hernioplasty.

The authors documented return to play (RTP) time, and subjective and objective outcome measures. To quantify surgical success, the doctors used a subjective evaluation by the patient (50% of the score), the Tegner score (35%), and time before RTP (15%). In the subjective evaluation, 5 or excellent merited 50 points; 4 or good, 35 points; 3 or satisfactory, 20 points. Any score below a 3 was given 0 points.

The last documented Tegner score was compared to the level of play before the onset of symptoms. If the athlete resumed the same level of activity or higher, 35 points were awarded. For a Tegner score of 1 grade lower, 15 points were awarded and no points were given for more than a 1 level decrease.

For RTP time, less than 2 months merited the maximum 15 points; 2-4 months, 10 points; more than 4 months, 5 points. Total scores of 90-100 were deemed excellent; 80-89, good; 70-79, fair; below 70, poor. These scores were also compared between the tenotomy only group and the combined tenotomy and hernioplasty group.

Of the 155 patients, 15 were lost over the 66-month period, resulting in 140 patients with sufficient data. Combining the groups, the mean subjective outcome was 4.4±0.9 out of 5 (range, 1-5). Of all the soccer players, the average preinjury Tegner score was 8.3±0.6 (range, 8-10). The average postoperative Tegner score was the same as the preoperative score, with only 2.8% or 4 patients having a reduced follow-up score. The mean RTP time was 11.6±5.4weeks (range, 4-36 weeks).

The combined score showed excellent results in 65% (92) patients, good results in 15% (21) patients, fair in 2.5 (3), and poor in 17% (24). No differences were found between the tenotomy only and the tenotomy and hernioplasty groups for the 3 main outcome measures and combined score.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy