LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Company News/KFx Medical Corporation: License Agreement with DePuy Mitek
Company News

KFx Medical Corporation: License Agreement with DePuy Mitek

July 29, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

KFx Medical Corporation: License Agreement with DePuy Mitek
Courtesy: KFx Medical Corp.
Secondary

KFx Medical Corporation has announced a new license agreement with DePuy Mitek, LLC (“Mitek”) relating to its patents used in knotless double row rotator cuff repair. Under the agreement, Mitek and its Johnson & Johnson affiliates will have the right to promote the use of products and techniques for knotless double row rotator cuff repair

“We are proud to have our innovation recognized by Mitek. Previously we announced our licensing agreement with Smith & Nephew for the same patents. I am pleased with the licensing arrangement with these two world leaders and knowing KFx’s valuable double row knotless rotator cuff technology will reach even more patients, ” indicated Tate Scott, president and CEO in the July 24, 2014 news release.

Tate Scott told OTW, “We are pleased to reach this agreement with DePuy/Mitek, a JNJ Company. Now JNJ, along with Smith and Nephew are the only companies licensed thus far to offer the patented KFx method that provides a true anatomic-like knotless reattachment of the rotator cuff. These industry leaders already have a great deal of sales; other than that, however, I am not a liberty to disclose additional details of the agreement. I can say that KFx is in discussions with other companies regarding licenses and in litigation with Arthrex regarding this patents.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy