LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Large Joints and Extremities/Shin Splints Runners’ Biggest Hazard
Large Joints and Extremities

Shin Splints Runners’ Biggest Hazard

June 24, 2014 1 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Shin Splints Runners’ Biggest Hazard
Source: Wikimedia Commons and Branko Radovanović
Secondary

You a beginning runner? Then beware of shin splints. Researchers in Denmark followed 933 beginning runners for an entire year to find out what injuries they experienced and how long it took them to get over them. The most common injury was shin splints and 27% of the 933 runners suffered from them. The average time to recover from shin splint injuries was 72 days.

The researchers defined a new runner as being one who had not run more than 10 kilometers in the year preceding. An injury was deemed to be anything that caused pain in the legs or in the lower back severe enough to curtail training for at least a week.

According to Scott Douglas, writing about the research for Running World, “of the 933 new runners, 254 met the definition of having a running injury during their first year.” For the majority of the runners, their injuries occurred during their first 125 miles of running. Ten percent experienced runner’s knee, 9% had a meniscus injury, 7% had Achilles tendinitis and 5% experienced either plantar fasciitis or an injury along the back of the leg.

Recovery times varied with plantar fasciitis taking the longest time to recover—an average of 159 days. Douglas reports that those with calf strains were able to resume normal running in 30 to 40 days. How well did the 254 injured runners recover? Two hundred twenty of the 254 injured runners, wrote Douglas, “recovered by the end of the one-year study while 34 were still injured.”

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy