LinkedInXFacebook
Subscribe
Orthopedics This Week
  • My Feed
  • |Posts
  • |Events
  • |MSK Innovations
  • |Power Rankings
  • |Masterclasses
  • |Technology Awards
  • Press Releases
  • |Advertising
  • |Job Board
  • Spine
  • ◆Joints
  • ◆Upper Extremities
  • ◆Foot & Ankle
  • ◆Sports Medicine
  • ◆Pain Mgmt
  • ◆Trauma
  • ◆Biologics
  • ◆Technology
  • ◆People
  • ◆Company News
  • ◆Legal & Regulatory
Home/Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement/Boeing and ACOs Dump Insurance Middle Man
Legal & Regulatory and Reimbursement

Boeing and ACOs Dump Insurance Middle Man

June 18, 2014 2 min read Premium comments

Advertisement

Boeing and ACOs Dump Insurance Middle Man
Image created by RRY Publications, LLC
Secondary

Boeing and healthcare providers in the Seattle area have dumped the insurance middle man.

On June 13, 2014, the giant aerospace company and two accountable care organizations (ACOs) formed by UW Medicine and Providence Health & Services and Swedish Health Services, formed a partnership to provide care for the employer. No insurance company is involved. Boeing has separate contracts with each provider.

“The advantage for Boeing will be that they can take the middle man out of the equation between the patients and the health system. It may be able to reduce cost, in part because of the simplification of not having the insurance mechanism in the middle, ” said Dr. Elliott Fisher, director of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice in New Hampshire.

“It’s a very interesting model and worth pursuing, ” Fisher said in an article published in the Seattle Times on June 17, 2013.

30, 000 Patients

Boeing has “created a flight plan for a new era of health care, ” said Paul Ramsey, M.D., chief executive officer of UW Medicine. Starting in January, 2015, 27, 000 Boeing employees and some 3, 000 retirees will begin the program. Eligible participants—who include nonunion workers and certain union-bargaining units—will also have the option of keeping their current plans or choosing another non-ACO plan. Those signing up for Preferred Partnership will select between Providence-Swedish or UW Medicine.

In the deals, the contracts set goals for the employees’ medical costs. If the costs are higher or lower, the provider either foots the bill or reaps the savings.

The contracts allow patients the ability to schedule appointments in a timely manner and require the providers to maintain patient safety and satisfaction information. There are additional benchmarks tied to costs, including reducing readmissions to hospitals after treatments and effectively managing chronic conditions such as diabetes and heart disease.

Advertisement

Patient Benefits

According to the Times, Boeing officials said there are numerous incentives for using Preferred Partnership, including lower paycheck deductions to pay for care, larger company contributions to Health Savings Accounts, no co-payments in many cases for visiting primary-care doctors and 100% coverage for generic-drug prescriptions.

Provider Efficiencies

One benefit to the providers is access to more patient data. Because Boeing is paying the costs, the company can share that data with providers, which can then try to determine the cheapest, most effective approaches.

The Providence-Swedish ACO includes the network’s clinics and hospitals, as well as The Everett Clinic, Pacific Medical Centers clinics, The Polyclinic, Proliance Surgeons and others. Some members of the UW Medicine network are Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and the Overlake and Northwest Hospital centers and clinics.

The disintermediation of healthcare delivery continues.

React:

Discussion

14
DS
Dr. Sarah MitchellOrthopedic Surgeon · Mayo Clinic

This is a fascinating development. In my practice we've seen similar outcomes with the revised protocol. The key differentiator seems to be patient selection criteria. Has anyone else noticed the correlation with BMI thresholds?

8
JT
James Thornton, MDSpine Fellow · HSS

Great point. I'd push back slightly on the conclusion, the sample size in the cited study is too small to draw population-level inferences. That said, the directional signal is compelling and worth a larger RCT.

5
RP
R. PatelSports Medicine · Stanford

We implemented a similar approach last year. Early results are promising but we're still gathering 12-month follow-up data. Happy to share our protocol if anyone is interested.

Join the conversation

Orthopedic professionals are discussing this. Sign in and upgrade to read every comment and add your voice.

Subscribe

Get Full Access

Read every OTW article and join member discussions for $24.99/month.

Get Full Access

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Orthopedics This Week

The most trusted source in orthopedic industry news since 2005. Covering spine, joints, trauma, biologics, and the business of orthopedics.

A publication of RRY Publications, LLC

LinkedInXFacebook

Categories

  • Spine
  • Joints
  • Upper Extremities
  • Foot & Ankle
  • Sports Medicine
  • Pain Mgmt
  • Trauma
  • Biologics
  • Technology
  • People
  • Company News
  • Legal & Regulatory

Resources

  • Subscribe
  • Community Posts
  • Job Board
  • Press Release Opportunities
  • Power Rankings
  • About OTW
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

Get Full Access

Unlimited articles, community posts, and Power Rankings.

Get Full Access

Plans start at $24.99/mo · Annual saves 20%

© 2026 Orthopedics This Week · RRY Publications, LLC

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie Policy